cryptocurrency legal Block

Even if there is still some money, which one do you add in the face of so many positions? If you are really given a chance to increase your position by a big drop, you can't achieve the purpose of spreading the cost at all with what little money you have left. Don't say it doesn't make sense to reduce the cost of the whole account, even for the stock you added, it doesn't help much.If you buy everything, even if you don't buy a lot of shares, it will cost a lot of money together. The downside is that when the market plummeted, the funds you could have gradually increased your positions are now taken up and gone.

Some people will ask, how much is less? Personally, if your capital does not exceed 1 million and you hold up to 5 or 6 stocks at the same time, that's enough. Even if you average the score, each stock will have nearly 200,000 funds, and 20% of the positions will be enough, regardless of the profit value of a single stock or the contribution to the portfolio.In the early stage of investment, few but fine are passive and need your control. Although you don't know what's right yet, you already know what's wrong, so it will be hard to control your behavior with willpower, which is certain and insurmountable.Your idea may be, anyway, if the east is not bright and the west is bright, it won't be a loss. If you think about it the other way around, you may feel terrible. It's not dark in the east and dark in the west, and it will always be dark, especially when the market falls.

Your idea may be, anyway, if the east is not bright and the west is bright, it won't be a loss. If you think about it the other way around, you may feel terrible. It's not dark in the east and dark in the west, and it will always be dark, especially when the market falls.The logic of profiteering is less but better.Stock selection is to keep going through the sieve, from big holes to small holes, from coarse mesh to fine mesh, over and over again. Until the finest and highest quality stocks are screened out.